[Benedict Cumberbatch is Jon Turturro in Star Trek: Barton Fink]

star trek: into darkness (2013)

WOW.

Several times during this movie (seen in 3D), I thought to myself “This is the greatest movie of my life!”

Not that it actually is exactly, but it was pretty spec-fuckin’-tacular.

There’s this one particular shot of a ship crashing into a city. SPECTACULAR. 

There’s a scene between Kirk & Spock that echoes a memorable scene from another Trek film. SPECTACULAR.

People violently ejected into space, a whole bunch of times: SPECTACULAR!

And there’s plenty of fun and jokes and pretty visuals and god damn.

Only during one scene did I seriously introspectivize the notion that “this is not trek!” and that was when…

[vague spoiler]

…Spock went to town on the villian, like Indy wailing on the big airplane wrestler Nazi in the face that time…

[/vague spoiler] 

…and I was thinking then, Hmm, this seems vehemently anti-Trekky. Anti-intellectual, even.

Other than that, GOOD FUCKING MOVIIIIIEEEE!!!! Action and violence and all kinds o’ hijinks.

:)

Side Effects (2013) meandered for the longest time but hit its stride in the last quarter. Left me with a nice smug grin on me face. :)

[amazon]

Bought this “Enter the Dragon” Lego tee in a shop in Takeshita Dori — before that Chuck Norris meme or the Universal Legofication of Everything — because it was the only thing in all if Harajuku that fit! It survived many a mosh pit.

RIP

I was talking with [director] Brad Bird one time, and he said it’s like the beginning of Return of the Jedi. Luke shows up and he’s a badass. He said they should’ve opened it with Luke in the swamp saying to Yoda, “You said ‘Don’t go.’ I said ‘Fuck you, I’m gonna go help my friends.’ I went and got my hand cut off and my friends are in even worse trouble because of what I did. I fucked up everything.” And then Yoda should have gone, “Now you’re a Jedi. Now you’re beyond the fear of failure. Now you’re ready.” That would have made it even cooler.

Used MP3 Stores

NYTimes:

On Thursday, the United States Patent and Trademark Office published Apple’s application for its own patent for a digital marketplace. Apple’s application outlines a system for allowing users to sell or give e-books, music, movies and software to each other by transferring files rather than reproducing them.

Meanwhile, a New York court is poised to rule on whether a start-up that created a way for people to buy and sell iTunes songs is breaking copyright law. A victory for the company would mean that consumers would not need either Apple’s or Amazon’s exchange to resell their digital items. Electronic bazaars would spring up instantly.

Would I start buying more than a couple albums or CDs each year if these used shops come about? Probably not.

“The technology to allow the resale of digital goods is now in place, and it will cause a dramatic upheaval,” said Bill Rosenblatt, president of GiantSteps, a technology consulting firm. “In the short term, it’s great for consumers. Over the long term, however, it could seriously reduce creators’ incentive to create.”

I’m fucking SWIMMING in movies and music that I have zero energy or time to digest, and I still love music and film. The world could USE some reduced creatoring!

ARGO wins Best Picture.

Why? How!?

The typical Academy member:

“Ooh, i work in the movie industry. Sure, just on various Adam Sandler crapfests or shitty horror movies or disposable animation that kids forget instantly, but this Argo movie shows i could potentially SAVE HOSTAGES! I’M NOBLE!!!” [ticks the box for Argo]

~and/or~

“Oof, poor Ben Affleck started out well, then fumbled his hollywood career badly, almost vanished… that could happen to me…” [ticks the box for Argo]

Argo was fine, but it’s not capital-G great… I think Lincoln reminds everyone in the Academy just how trivial their entire careers have been in the grand scheme of things, and THAT’S why it got dissed.

Donald Richie, American Expert on Japan, Is Dead at 88

Donald Richie, one of the most prominent American writers on Japan and on expatriate life, who is best known for introducing the English-speaking world to the golden age of Japanese cinema, including the director Akira Kurosawa, died on Tuesday at a hospital in Tokyo. He was 88.

In 1959, he and Joseph Anderson published what is regarded by film studies experts as the first English-language book on Japanese movies, “The Japanese Film: Art and Industry.” In his memoir, he recounted how in the late 1940s he paid his first visit to a Japanese studio, where he met a director in a white floppy hat and “someone I guessed was a star … in a loose Hawaii-shirt.” Thus began Mr. Richie’s lifelong acquaintance with two of the giants of Japanese cinema, Mr. Kurosawa and the actor Toshiro Mifune.

Openly bisexual, Mr. Richie also wrote frankly about his lovers both male and female, saying Japan’s greater tolerance of homosexuality in the 1940s compared to the United States was one reason he returned after graduating from Columbia University in 1953.

Still, Mr. Richie seemed to have a complex view of the nation where he spent most of his life. In his writings, he did not shy from painting a less-than-rosy picture of its xenophobic society. Yet, he also found much to praise, particularly the sense of balance and subtlety apparent in traditional Japanese arts.

Indeed, some of Mr. Richie’s most poignant writings describe his status as an American expatriate in a nation that keeps outsiders at a distance. He said he never sought to become a Japanese citizen, but instead seemed to revel in his position on the margins of Japanese society, which he wrote offered him far greater personal freedom than he could have had back in Ohio.

Get Richie’s memoir The Japan Journals:1947-2004 at Amazon.com ^_^

Evangelion 3.33 is avail for pre-order NOW, comes out 4/24!

Exciting!

I never got through the TV series — too many long, static shots of silhouetted people in elevators talking about budgets, and long, panning landscapes with birds (or locusts) chirping. Every 20 minute episode felt like an hour and fifty.

(I was watching it in Japanese, on Japanese TV, unfluently, back in 1996, when it was EXPLODING over there: anime stores were taken over with EVA merch, it aired on television a bunch, incl. a New Years-ish marathon that I stalwartly attempted to sit through, drinking [fell asleep around episode 8…])

I tried to watch it with English subbing on VHS a couple years later, back in New York. And then on DVD a few years after that, back in Tokyo again. 

I never got through it. 

So when I checked out Evangelion 1.11 in 1080p a couple months ago, I wasn’t expecting much.

But awesomely, it was retelling the same-ish story as the TV series, but WITH A BUDGET. There were identical shots and dialog as in the TV series, but everything moved faster and looked better. There was still dramatic tension, but it didn’t feel like the director was trying to eat up a few extra seconds with another long still shot of whatever.

If you’ve tried to get into Evangelion (the TV show) and just couldn’t, you should try 1:11 and 2:22 and the upcoming 3:33 (and 4:44 in another year)… it’s really good.

Evangelion 3.33 is avail for pre-order NOW, comes out 4/24! ^_^

lost in translation (2003)

I HATED this movie ten years ago, living in Japan. It portrayed the Japanese as moronic, Bill Murray was the worst kind of American asshole, Scarlett Johansson was a whiny shut-in, the script featured too many old gags about R’s & L’s (“lip my stocking”, etc)… it screamed close-minded unworldliness.

Also it felt soooo sloowwwww.

But that was ten years ago. Over the last couple years I’ve been getting into mellower, more contemplative cinema, like Woody Allen’s recent ScarJoey movies (Match Point, Scoop, and esp. Vicky Christina Barcelona).  

Feeling nostalgic for some Japanese scenery, and it being a decade and all, I went back and re-watched Lost in Translation late last night.

Bill Murray came off as less of a jerk this time, and I was less defensive about the ridiculous Japanese directors and businessmen and their portrayal, this time reading it as an injunction against ALL shallow and/or dippy creative and business types regardless of nationality (witness Giovanni Ribisi and Anna Faris also being portrayed negatively). 

I understood Murray’s tired point of view more, his feeling lost or stuck. I resented his being morose while earning $2 million for a couple days’ “work” less. 

I saw Bill and Scarlett hanging out as more realistic, as two people who clicked, and overcame the “old man want sex, young woman want money” angle that seemed to subconsciously drive the relationship on my first viewing.

And the pair did go out quite a bit — a couple parties, a strip club, karaoke, Kyoto temples, shabu-shabu. 

I still didn’t see it as a romance so much as a couple souls connecting in a strange place (a connection I still think would completely evaporate once the isolation and alienation they were feeling vanished — their entire bonding relied on them being “them against the world” for the duration of their stay). 

Also, the photography was rarely more than pedestrian; there’s maybe a dozen shots (golf with Mt Fuji in the background, a few shots looking out windows) that speak truthfully about the beauty of the country, and way too many handheld shots crossing streets in Shibuya or Shinjuku or wherever they were. I recalled the film looking better than it does.

So, all in all an improvement in my opinion of the film, but to my mind it’s still’s not ALL THAT like a lot of people think. But now, if you say you like it, I won’t immediately write-off your opinion of everything else. 

:/

killing them softly (2012) was unusual.

It should have been dull, but it wasn’t. It was cinematographically arresting in several spots, and well written throughout (like Aaron Sorkin but way less pitter-pattery).

The vibe was kind of like Drive, but without the “romance” that ate up half that film and made it shitty.

Killing motivated me want to check out The Assassination of Long Titles by the Coward President Gerald Ford’s Motorcade (2007?), writer/director Andrew Dominik’s other big movie.

:)

Why I disliked Looper: [SPOILERS]

  • It’s hard to get away with murder in the future… but someone killed my wife in the future (mostly by accident!) so we could have a plot, and now I HAVE TO MURDER TWO INNOCENT SCHOOLCHILDREN.


Really you could stop there, but also:

  • If you’re gonna time-travel people back in time to have them instantly killed, why not just drop them from two miles up into the middle of the ocean, or to the bottom of it, or into the sun, or under 20 feet of dirt in the field you’re already sending them to?
     
  • “We could go round and round with this shit for days drawing on napkins and….” No, asshole, if your movie is based around some trope, you should understand how that trope works in your film’s world, not shrug it off in a way you think is cute. 
     
  • I’m a guy who murders strangers, but I will die for one so the movie can conclude on a positive note.
     
  • Joseph Gordon-Levitt’s face.
     
  • Emily Mortimer Blunt’s face.


Brick was way better (and Brothers Bloom wasn’t.) Premium Rush was a pleasant surprise. Looper was gussied-up junk with a few cool elements.

:(